tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2880033253850981576.post622235544297032549..comments2024-03-10T08:56:14.905+00:00Comments on 1995 Batman.com : Riddle Me This - A brief follow up about the Schumacher CutJack Thursbyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03101157160144955486noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2880033253850981576.post-66244992621801141542021-06-21T11:34:08.516+01:002021-06-21T11:34:08.516+01:00There's some potentially relevant information ...There's some potentially relevant information in the BBFC Annual report for 1995 which discussed BF on pages 5-6:<br />https://darkroom.bbfc.co.uk/original/1d477a095d267b74d2511e5852f56ebb:520fcc3f67dcc481bf6de960aa9e63ee/bbfc-annual-report-1995-96.pdf<br /><br />Chiefly; "Batman Forever was re-edited several times in America after the BBFC's initial viewing, but again the PG-13 version version that emerged was too violent to be given anything lower than a "12" in Britain". The report then talks about the US PG-13 version being trimmed so it could be a UK PG, but this seems to imply that the film was initially a bit more violent than the PG-13 version which became the international standard (and was eventually released in the UK on 12+ DVD and blu-ray).WilloughbyStainhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01654798754073621266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2880033253850981576.post-44120303789254285132021-06-17T11:26:06.793+01:002021-06-17T11:26:06.793+01:00I like the theatrical version, but if they're ...I like the theatrical version, but if they're going to release the workprint of the film, I'll be very unhappy.The Film Historianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05156167188089918552noreply@blogger.com