Showing posts with label Joel Schumacher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joel Schumacher. Show all posts

Saturday, August 29, 2026

Rare archival Batman Forever PR interview unearthed

A few years ago I picked up this old audio reel labelled "Batman Forever" and recently I got it converted.

It's a fun little piece of the movie's marketing that I don't think has been heard before. I assume it was done as audio and sent over to radio stations to promote the movie. If anyone knows any more, please let me know.

It contains some clips from the film, interviews with four cast members and the director followed by a short excerpt of Elliot Goldenthal's score.

In this video, I give a few thoughts and then play the whole thing. 

Again, if you think I've missed anything important, let me know in the comments. I wasn't sure if the film clips were slightly different from the finished film and didn't have a chance to compare them.

If you'd rather, you can download the mp3 to listen to yourself here.

Or if you want to read it, I've done a transcription of the interviews below. 

Beware though, there are no interviewer questions so it can seem at times that the interviewee is rambling a little. I kind of enjoyed how laid back and unpolished it is though.

VAL KILMER ON BRUCE WAYNE: He has an office, a desk, a secretary. He doesn't stay there very long. He shows up every now and again, kind of like Howard Hughes. Hughes actually didn't have an office. He would just show up. He would know everything. It's sort of that style. It's very specific and it's really grand. Everything is big. It's so big. We shot at Universal as well as Warner Brothers and down in Long Beach. There's not enough space in Warner Brothers, so we rented some more. It's a big world, Gotham. 

One of the main themes is identity. Harvey Two-Face is the easiest example because he split right down the middle. But Bruce Wayne's dilemma has to do with himself and his past, but the result of how he reacted to his parents being murdered by a psychopath was to become Batman. And is it a good thing and why should he continue and can he have a life without being Batman? And his personal story is mirrored in Dick Grayson's story, his parents' die and he's consumed with revenge. He can't think about anything else and he has his own personal journey about being split, about what he knows is really right and what he feels he needs to do about getting revenge.

VAL KILMER ON CHOOSING THE ROLE: It really, truly was everything about it. It's extremely captivating, obviously. It almost feels odd talking about the things, about the entity of the story about Batman because everybody knows it. This 50 years has maintained this interest. 

There's something really elemental that Bob Kane created. He was around quite a bit, which I was really happy about, because what he created was really extraordinary. He was just a kid when he started. I think he was 19 or 20, right before the Second World War. And what he did in the comic books, which is maintained and started many different styles, of storytelling really that he created or encapsulated quite radical corrupt politicians and he was dealing with current events at the time in this highly stylized way and all quite serious if you want to look at it that way. And why it's so successful is it also hits readers, audiences in all of its manifestations in a vivid and entertaining way obviously. We like the stuff. 

It was kind of almost disappointing sometimes when kids would be on the set because I would want to do my voice and do a cape routine or something and they weren't interested. The image of it, their minds go off. You get this highly concentrated, glazed look. And I knew there was nothing I could do. The soup sort of took care of it all.

TOMMY LEE JONES ON CHOOSING THE ROLE: It was just a great deal of fun. to be a comic book character. I mean, ordinarily I look for certain subtleties that a comic book doesn't concern itself with. So it was liberating, of course, to be a comic book villain. 

Yes, I mean, I'd never heard of Harvey Two-Face, even though I'd read the comic books when I was a child. If I had heard of Harvey, I had only a vague memory of it. But my son knew who he was immediately and was very enthusiastic about the movie. In fact, he was enthusiastic about it sooner than I was, which is to say instantly. It took me a little bit longer to talk myself into it. And it was his enthusiasm that was decisive for me, really. 

Two Face is, just, he believes in brute force. I mean, his plan is to kill Batman. It's that simple. One of his plans, usually what he tries to do is set a trap for Batman. He'll wreck havoc and wait until the bat comes to restore order and try to ambush him. He does that on several occasions. That's his modus operandi. 

Well, at first he's insisted that anyone could break into his high hideout. But when the Riddler suggests that he may have a way to learn Batman's identity and then render him helpless and then hurt him and then kill him, Harvey is very pleased to enter into a partnership with the Riddler. Of course the Riddler's character changes all the time. Harvey's character does not. They're more consistent.

JIM CARREY PLAYING THE RIDDLER: I thought about that. I thought about who I might be, and I think the Riddler is pretty much perfect. It would have been the Riddler or the Joker, you know, one of the two. I think he hated Bruce Wayne to begin with. He hated him because he had everything that he wanted. And I think that's how that starts. It really isn't about really loving somebody. It's about not loving yourself and seeing somebody who is the guy that you'd love to be and resenting him for it. And that's how it basically snowballs. 

It's just a great character because it's, I mean, he starts out pretty much bonkers to begin with, but it just takes on different forms and he gets so full of you know, just energy and evil power. You just can't help but love playing that. It's the ultimate juice master. Basically it saps the IQ from whoever watches the television that it's hooked up to and redirects the brain waves into Edward Nygma's skull. And so he's sucking Gotham's brain waves. He's devouring people's IQ and so he just you know becomes a mega intellect although he's mad you know so I mean intellect with madness is kind of a fun combination you know I just I love the character because you know it's basically he realizes that you know it's not who has the answers it's who knows the questions?

I thought I looked a lot like Michelle Pfeiffer, actually. He's not a very physical guy, except for he's very flamboyant. He's very, he's very, he's got a little touch of Fred Astaire, a panache – a joie de vivre. But, you know, but he's not going to hurt anybody with his fists, but he'll pick up a rock. That's where you have to be careful.

CHRIS O’DONNELL ON ROBIN: Robin's story is pretty close to the story of Robin in the comic books. He comes from the Flying Graysons, which, you know, he's from the circus. And he's lived on the circus all his life, which has kind of toughened him up a little bit. He's a little bit of a gypsy lifestyle. And, you know, he's a pretty cocky young guy until he has this, you know, traumatic experience. And he wants to be a part of the team as soon as he finds a Batcave. He sees everything down there, and he figures that's a way he can get back and avenge his parents' death, but Batman doesn't want him to be a part of him. At first he doesn't like Bruce Wayne and doesn't like Batman. Then Batman wants to protect him and doesn't want him to be a part of it. But after they kind of help each other out and save each other, they finally become a team. 

Well, yeah, I mean, they both saw their parents die before their eyes. And I think that is why Bruce Wayne offers to take in Dick Grayson - offer him a place to stay because he sympathizes for him. Dick Grayson, he kind of resents Bruce Wayne, some rich guy, who is Dick Dick Grayson thinks he's just kind of, of himself as being kind of a tough guy, you know, been living on the road and wants nothing to do with it. But he is out to, you know, get two-faced and anything that can help him, he's going to take. So when he finds out that he's Batman and that he's got the Batcave and all that, he wants to be a part of it. And Batman, who realizes what it means to become a part of this, wants to protect him and saying he doesn't want him to be a part of it. But, they go through a course of events where they both end up saving each other and a partnership is formed. 

CHRIS O'DONNELL ON FILMING: I mean, there was a lot of fight scenes and I didn't have a problem with them as far as when they were choreographing these fight scenes. I picked up on them pretty quickly. And I think that was mainly because of the Three Musketeers, which I had worked on, with these really long sword fights, which took weeks to choreograph. These really intricate moves. I mean, a couple punches and a kick here or there, it was like, wasn't that bad. 

But there were other things in this movie that you had to deal with that were tough. I mean, these suits are kind of constricting. They give you perfect posture, actually. Well, Robin is after Two-Face in particular, because Two-Face is responsible for the death of his family. So he really is out to get them and avenge their deaths. I figure out a way to get down to the Batcave and I find the Batmobile. And Dick Grayson decides it would be fun to take the old Batmobile for a spin, probably do pretty well with the ladies out in the city cruising around the Batmobile. And in the course of cruising around Gotham City, I find a young lady in distress who's being chased by a gang of hoodlums. So I come to the rescue. When they see the Batmobile, everyone thinks it's the Batman himself, but it's just me. Batmobile is pretty cool. 

Batmobile is very cool. I'd like to take it home, but I don't think that's going to happen. I think you'll probably get from here to Chicago in about - very quickly. I don't know when Robin's going to get his own toys, though, you know. It's about time. What about Robin? You know, I got a motorcycle. Can't they spruce it up and give me the Robin, Mo-cycle or mobile?

JOEL SCHUMACHER MAKING THE FILM: It was the most fun I've ever had in my life making a movie. And I've really enjoyed myself on all my movies. But this was the most fun. The cast was so much fun. And the crew was so much fun. But making, I wanted to make a living comic book. And you know, when you're doing a comic book, the reality police aren't hanging over your shoulder all the time. So you have the license to really use all the imaginative and creative people around you. And the cast was wonderful. They all had a lot of great ideas. And even though it's the third of the Warner Brothers Batman movies, it was our first. So for us, it was the first time and it was, and the cast the first time. So it was really exciting. 

It was exciting to go to work every day. Comic books. Batman's been around since 1939 and so the first thing I did was call DC Comics and I got as many comics as I could get my hands on from 1939 right up till now where there are extraordinary artists and storytellers working on them because there's so many different kinds of Batman comic books now. I just read hundreds of comic books for a long time, and it was great. I could read them on planes and in the doctor's office and wherever I was, because it was my job. But I'm sure everybody thought, what's this old hippie doing reading comic books? And I just immersed myself in the folklore, the legends, and the comic books. The wonderful use of color, the wonderful use of imagination, the stretch of imagination, the fun of scaling buildings with Batman. 

JOEL SCHUMACHER ON THE BATMAN CHARACTER: You know, I just got immersed in Batman's world and that was the real, the essence of the starting point. I think the one unique thing that separates him from a lot of superheroes is that he's a man. He's not a superman. He's a man with extraordinary power, I mean extraordinary human powers. He's a man whose parents were killed in front of him and who has become a vigilante by putting on this black bat suit. and going out at night and trying to right wrongs and he has all the vulnerabilities and all of the flaws and all of the human drama that any human being has. 

He's not perfect and he's not impenetrable. I've tried to structure a very strong story about duality because Batman is also Bruce Wayne. So there is a struggle for Bruce Wayne to find his identity insofar as why he ever became Batman. To think, to look back in his past as a child and the events that happened to him and why he became Batman. So there is a mythic quality to the revelation of that story, how he became Batman and he has a choice as a man now whether to continue to be Batman or not. And so the story is about duality and therefore everything that was created around that was to serve it.

JOEL SCHUMACHER ON THE NEW CHARACTERS: Dick Grayson, I brought in Dick Grayson who becomes Robin because his family has also been killed by a criminal. And he's a mirror of what happened to Bruce Wayne when he was younger. So he gets to relive that through another person. 

Nicole Kidman not only plays a criminologist who deals with dual personalities, she is in love with Batman and Bruce Wayne is in love with her. So she's having a triangle with the same two men. And then there's no greater character to show duality than Harvey Two-Face because you have Tommy Lee Jones as a man who is literally split in two. One side with the vestige of whatever rational judicious thinking he had as a district attorney and the other side a crazed maniac killer. And then Jim Carrey's Riddler, the sign of the Riddler is a huge question mark. And so Jim is there as the Riddler to question Val's total identity. The Riddler questions Bruce Wayne and Batman's whole identity. And so the piece Hopefully you'll feel that the movie is somewhat about that, with lots of fun and games on top of this, of course. 

The Riddler in real Gotham life is Edward Nygma. And Edward Nygma in this particular version of Batman starts out as a techno nerd genius with egomaniacal plans to be a bigger and greater electronics genius than Bruce Wayne because Bruce Wayne, we've also introduced Wayne Enterprises into this Batman, which has classically always been the business, the industry that Bruce Wayne runs. And there's an electronics division. And he works for Bruce Wayne as one of the many people in white lab coats doing experiments and creating new ideas. But he actually wants to be bigger than Bruce Wayne. And so that begins a story of revenge and jealousy and competition that drive him over the edge. And he becomes the Riddler and a criminal and a psychotic and quite a foe to be dealt with. 

JOEL SCHUMACHER ON THE NEW GADGETS, VEHICLE AND SUITS: Well, the Batmobile is the mother of all gadgets, right? there are fabulous new bat bolos and batarangs and special batarangs, a great one that Val uses at the end of the movie. I don't want to tell you how. There's a brand new bat suit besides the one we created for the movie that Val wears most of the time. At the very end of the movie, he wears a brand new bat suit never seen before with much different looking and with extraordinary extra gadgets and powers and things that it does. And there's a gun. There's a gun that shoots out a blue ray that stuns people, that stuns bad guys. That's pretty exciting. There's a lot of winches and gadgets. 

And the Batmobile does a spectacular gadget trick during a car chase with Two-Face and Batman that I like A lot. And because Wayne Enterprises is partly an electronics empire, there are a lot of electronics, computers, technology, and Jim Carrey's invention in the movie is a holographic three-dimensional device that enhances your television set, but it also has a very insidious side effect that feeds his criminal mind. And so there's a lot of, it's kind of like the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s, and the year 2000 all smashed together in one city. Kind of like now, you know, kind of like LA.

Friday, September 12, 2025

Drew goes into more detail about the far superior "Schumacher Cut"

In a follow-up to this post from June, Drew Griffin is back to talk more about the Schumacher Cut that he was fortunate to have seen at a secret screening.

Lots of interesting topics and thoughts in this video such as: why the Warner Brothers sent a cease and desist and stopped the Cinefile screening and what it will take to make this version of the film releasable. 

Wednesday, July 2, 2025

Tomasz Zaglewski's book Neon Knight Forever now out in paperback

For those of you who didn't buy the excellent book Neon Knight Forever: The Legacy of Joel Schumacher's Batman Duology by Tomasz Żaglewski back when it was first released in December 2023 (possibly due to the high price of the hardcover edition) I'm pleased to say it's now been released in both paperback and kindle format.


Here are the links for Amazon UK and Amazon US

The cost for the UK paperback actually has a discount going right now so it's only £23.99

The US paperback is $39.95

I should say I'm not getting payment to promote the book, I'm just a fan of it! My only bias is that I and this website do get a quick mention on one of the pages towards the end.

If you didn't see my previous review of it - check that out here. I will probably do a short video review of it in the coming weeks as I re-read the book.

Also, Tomasz reached out to me recently to let me know some awesome news. 

Back in March, he curated an exhibition at the Zamek Cultural Center in Poznań called Nineties Forever! - which looked back at pop culture and memorabilia from the 1990s in Poland. As part of this there were some film screenings and he not only included Batman Forever but also managed to get the Bat symbol projected on the castle tower.



Monday, March 24, 2025

A look back at the Batman Unmasked exhibition

Another different type of video this week - a look back at the temporary Batman Unmasked exhibition that was in Covent Garden in London from September to December 2024 (and also Manchester before that).

I meant to get this edited last year when I actually went to the exhibition as a way to show people what it was like before they went. Unfortunately I ended up not getting around to editing it until this year, after the exhibition had closed. Oops. Oh well I guess at least I didn't spoil all the surprises.

Anyway, hope this is of interest. It was really great to see all these old Schumacher Batman movie costumes and props up close - the actual things that the actors used and wore. You could see all the scuffs and marks on them and paint was visibly peeling off some bits. There was a little bit from all the Batman movies from the last 35 years but the Schumacher stuff was what stuck out. The costumes and props from those two films are so colourful and over the top. It's probably what got me so interested in making props recently. 

When you see this stuff up close you realise how important all the camera work and lighting and effects are - because the reality is that lots of this stuff looks kinda cheap when you're eyes are inches from it. It was never built to be poured over like this or last as long as it has.

The exhibition was a little pricey and short for what you got but I'm still glad I went. I appreciate the theatricality that went into it. It certain made it feel a little grander than it actually was. 


























Monday, December 16, 2024

Neon Knight Forever audiobook - read by Drew Griffin

Once again Drew Griffin has provided us with another audiobook. This it's time it's Tomasz Zaglewski's Neon Knight Forever book that charts the evolution of how Joel Schumacher's Batman duology has been perceived by fans and critics over the last 30 years. 

Check out my review here.

Also if you enjoy this recording, I'm excited to say Tomasz's book is coming out in paperback in June 2025 - just in time for the 30th anniversary of Batman Forever. 

Pre-order your copy here for UK or here for US.

Friday, July 26, 2024

News: Akiva Goldsman is trying to get the Schumacher Cut released

More news from this year's San Diego Comic Con. 

Screenwriter Akiva Goldsman was speaking at the "Producers on Producing Panel", hosted by Steve Weintraub, and was asked about the Schumacher Cut of Batman Forever.

He revealed that he has been trying, since Joel Schumacher's death in 2020, to get Warner Brothers interested in doing a polished version of "Batman Forever: Preview One" (presumably a very early test screening cut of the film - the exact contents of this cut are still unknown).

He has mentioned this "Preview One" cut before but it is unknown if this is the same cut as the one Kevin Smith screened last year at his Smodcastle Cinema. 

Akiva was very good friends with Joel and wants to revisit the film as a tribute to him.

Unfortunately the hold up is that Warner Brothers keeps changing management which resets the project back to the start. He mentioned "one administration ago" the project was close to being approved.

In terms of what need doing, Akiva said: "There’s some visual effects that need to be finished. There would be some music that would have to be if not re-scored or rewritten. The whole soup to nuts was about a million bucks. They were on the verge of doing it and then Warner got sold again. There’s a-whole-nother DC."

This is fantastic news as it sounds like Goldsman is not only keen to see this cut released but also willing to keep pushing and actually oversee it's creation! 

I know for some this will be seem like a non-story but I think the fact that someone with Akiva's clout (remember, he's not just a screenwriter but a highly successful TV and film producer too) is willing to see this through, gives it much more of a chance of happening.

It sounds like Akiva is bidding his time, waiting for the new DCU to start up, and will then pursue the project with Warner Brothers and DC again.

Read the full Collider article here:-
https://collider.com/batman-forever-directors-cut-joel-schumacher/

Friday, January 5, 2024

Book Review: Neon Knight Forever: The Legacy of Joel Schumacher’s Batman Duology by Tomasz Zaglewski

Review by Neil Rickatson

I have to preface this review and state that I am acknowledged twice within the text of this book. I will do my best to stay as impartial as possible. 

In today’s world everyone is very quick to compartmentalise every aspect of their life. Turn everything into a binary 0 or 1. Nothing is immune. I can’t throw a virtual rock on the internet without hitting “That’s the worst movie I ever saw” or “That’s the best movie I ever saw.” There is little room for any sort of nuance. And inevitably we end up with a handful of great movies that everyone universally agrees are great, and the rest go in a pile to the side to be left untouched. 

Logic dictates that only this first pile of great movies should be written about when actually I find much more satisfaction in looking at the other pile. For years, the Schumacher Batman movies have been dragged through the mud. On release Batman Forever was seen as a slick but empty exercise in commercial filmmaking. Batman & Robin by contrast was seen as an excessive, noisy, exhausting hollow product. Comic book fans, in particular, turned to the internet and railed against both films for multiple reasons: their deviation from the comics, their humorous take on the material and their style choices. 

And here’s the thing that bothered me. They didn’t let up. At all. No one was allowed to get a word in edgeways. So the narrative has been the Schumacher movies sucked, they have zero value and they should be talked about as briefly as possible. 

Thankfully time is a healer. After almost 30 years, Professor Tomasz Żaglewski (from the Institute of Cultural Studies, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland) has taken the task of looking at both films and trying to find what their legacy is. To be clear this is not a book about the making of the films (though a little bit of that is covered here and there) but a book that examines how people thought about Schumacher’s Batman duology then and how they think about them now. 

Here is a quick overview of the topics covered:- 

Part 1 talks about the place of the Schumacher films in Batman fandom. How they are seen as being “wrong” because they did not have a dark and serious tone. How they were also out of step with where the character was in the comics at the time. It also talks about how difficult it is to pin down any kind of definitive Batman portrayal (very true) and looks at some of the various versions of Batman over the years. Some were familiar to me such as Dark Knight and Camp Knight. Others were new terms I hadn’t seen before Cute Knight, Toy Knight, Dad Knight! 

Part 2 looks in more detail at the elements around the movie. Joel Schumacher (often seen as a generic journeyman director) is viewed with a fresh lens. Seen as a director who kept coming back to “trespasser” characters and stories. There is also a look at the shift from Burton's version of Batman to Schumacher's version. Were they their own thing or was Schumacher attempting to tie both universes together? 

Part 3 looks at some of the talking points around the films. The figures (which some people thought were disappointing because you couldn't get a figure that looked like they did in the film). The video games which are not beloved due to their frustratingly clunky controls. And finally… the bat nipples that featured in both films and what an overblown fuss they caused. 

The final part looks at how the duology has shifted in terms of public perception over the years. How the films were not well reviewed at the time and B&R, in particular, had a disappointing (but not disastrous) box office. To today where the films enjoy a small and loyal fandom (this is where I come in - which was surreal to read). And finally ends by talking about the online push for an extended cut of Batman Forever. 

All in all, this is a great, very knowledgeable book with a fantastic grasp of the subject. Tomasz is – I believe from the introduction – sympathetic to Schumacher’s aims and picks through both Batman movies, finding all sorts of interesting and varied subject matter. He draws on all areas of prior Batman expertise – such as Will Brooker, William Uricchio and Roberta E. Pearson. 

I must confess the whole book even made me look at both Batman Forever and Batman & Robin with renewed respect. I particularly enjoyed the second part of the book which dealt with Joel. I recently have been going through all of Schumacher’s filmography and was delighted to be shown this idea in Neon Knight Forever that there is this unified “trespasser” theme that runs through many of his films (one of his last movies was even called Trespass – how did I miss that). There’s this thinking that Tim Burton was “the artist”, and Joel was a “studio shill” but the book makes great pains to remind us that Joel did have thematic elements that interested him and with these two Batman films he did have a vision – to make a “living comic book”. It might not have been beloved by everyone but there was thought put behind it all. He was not the toy and cartoon and merchandise-obsessed man that a lot of people think he was. 

The book also reminded me of various little moments that I’d filed away and forgotten or outright missed. Such as how, even though the continuity is sketchy at best, Batman & Robin is designed to be a progression from the Burton films. Joel wanted to evolve the character of Bruce Wayne to be in a different place from the beginning of the franchise. I also chuckled at some of the old reviews and comments about both films. Gene Siskel’s review of B&R as a “a sniggering, exhausting, overproduced extravaganza that has virtually all of the humanity pounded out of it in the name of an endless parade of stunt sequences”. In some ways he’s not wrong, there’s times I watch and feel the same way (other times I just go with it and enjoy the "extravaganza" and "endless parade of stunt sequences"). 

The book also compares - or rather brings up comparisons of - Batman & Robin to recent films such as Thor: Love and Thunder and Birds of Prey. The former (which I haven’t seen yet) is an interesting comparison because the Marvel Cinematic Universe for many years has been a success juggernaut yet even I was aware that online fans had roundly eviscerated the fourth Thor movie in similar ways to B&R. Criticising it’s campy, playful, comedic tone. Neon Knight Forever begins by citing MCU boss Kevin Feige talking (in 2009) about B&R being a watermark that “demanded a new way of doing things. It created the opportunity to do X-Men and Spider-Man, adaptations that respected the source material and adaptations that were not campy.” Interesting to see that 14 years later Feige is producing a new campy, comedic superhero movie that goes against these earlier words. Perhaps camp is a necessary outlet that must be brought out every few years – a sort of cyclical event – if nothing else for a bit of variety. Perhaps there is a limit to the public’s appetite for dark, serious superhero movies. Maybe we can't keep telling the same story, with the same tone over and over again.

There really isn’t much I can criticise the book about. I would have loved for it to be a little bit longer. I also would have loved to have seen the book cover a little more on the online reaction to Batman & Robin circa 1997 - I feel it was a watershed moment when the internet started to become infinitely more important in terms of film criticism than newspapers/journals/TV. It democratised film criticism for better and for worse. Ain’t It Cool News’ review of Batman & Robin which drew comparisons of the audience feeling like “survivors of Hiroshima” was - I feel - a lightning rod for comic book fans and set the tone for the next few decades of online film reviews. 

But maybe that’s for part 2. I certainly feel there’s more to be discussed about both these films. And hopefully now Tomasz has broken the seal, others will come forward to give Schumacher’s duology their own analysis. 

I thank Tomasz for writing such an eloquent book, it has given me much to think about and I urge anyone with a passing interest in Batman Forever and/or Batman & Robin to buy a copy.




Sunday, July 16, 2023

New book on Schumacher's Batman movies "Neon Knight Forever" to be released in December

Tomasz Żaglewski - a professor in film and audiovisual culture - has written a NEW book that analyses both of Joel Schumacher’s Batman movies titled “Neon Knight Forever”. 

I'm really looking forward to reading this (and will no doubt be reviewing it when it comes out). As far as I know Schumacher's Batman movies have never really been written about in this way - deconstructed, analysed, and talked about in an academic fashion. 

Let's face it, for the last two decades most of what has been written about Batman Forever and Batman & Robin has been negative online comments by irate comic nerds mad about nipples or campy acting. It's nice that someone wants to talk about it in a balanced way. 

Here's a preview of the chapter headings:-

Introduction: 'Can I persuade you to take a sandwich with you, sir?' 
1. Neon Knight Begins: The Not-So-Dark Knight as an Element in Batman's Transmedia Multiverse 
1.1. Into the Bat-verse: From the Multiverse of Stories to the Multiverse of Readings 
1.2. Camp Knight, Dad Knight or Cute Knight? Exploring the Foundations of the Neon Knight 
2. The Neon Knight Unchained: Questionable Choices and the Ice-Catching Spectacle in Batman Forever and Batman & Robin 
2.1. Who's Afraid of the Big, Black Bat? Joel Schumacher as a Cinematic Trespasser 
2.2. Tim Burton's Noir-tmare before Christmas vs. Joel Schumacher's Camp Noir: Embracing a Living Comic Book as a Visual Thriller 
2.3. The Lite Knight Rises: The Troubling Case of the Plastic Figures, Virtual Grappling Hooks, and Rubber Nipples 
3. The Neon Knight Triumphant: Modern Perception of Joel Schumacher's Batman Duology 
3.1. 'It's So Bad, It's Almost Good': Fandom's Online Discourse Following Joel Schumacher's Passing 
3.2. Schumacher was right': Social Media Appreciation for the Neon Knight Closing Remarks or 'We're going to need a bigger cave'

The book is due for release in December 2023, you can pre-order now by following the link:- https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/neon-knight-forever-9798765100608/



Friday, February 18, 2022

Batman Forever Merchandise Review - Batarang Batman figure from Kenner

I'm getting pretty close now to having a complete set of the Batman Forever Kenner figures. This one took a while to track down. Had to get a boxed version as you don't see many loose ones about. It's also a bit of a nightmare to search for being that it's called 'Batarang Batman'. Wish they'd have come up with a more unique title there Kenner.

Anyway, the figure itself is kind of neat. The transculent green on the arms and legs add a dash of vibrant colour and I've got to give the designer points for not doing just another backpack/missile accessory. The twisting Batarang is kind of cool and works well for knocking over bad guy figures. As I say in the video I'm sure this is borrowed from the Scarecrow figures from the BTAS and Legend of the Dark Knight lines.

This is definitely one of the better figures in the Batman Forever line. The only thing that lets it down a bit is the flat purple chest.

Friday, September 3, 2021

Magazine Article: Sci Fi Universe July 1995

The second issue of Sci Fi Universe that covered Batman Forever is a lovely in-depth series of articles about various aspects of the film. One of the interesting things to note in this article is that there's an honesty to how rushed the production was. I know I already knew the budget but it bears repeating - this movie was made for $70 million!

There's also some interesting little bits of info like Joel talking about how they wrestled with coming up with the movie's title.

And Pat Hingle also gives lots of interesting insights. He even gives a gist of what the Marlon Wayans version of Robin was meant to be in Batman Returns (he must have had a great memory to remember that considering none of it was shot or in the final script).









Friday, August 20, 2021

Magazine Article: Sci Fi Universe June 1995

One of two issues of Sci Fi Universe that covered Batman Forever. This one is just really a primer with Joel Schumacher explaining the film and how it differs from the Tim Burton ones. I do love that he says Bob Kane approved of everything except Dick's earring and the nipples on the suit.








Wednesday, June 16, 2021

Riddle Me This - A brief follow up about the Schumacher Cut

Today is June 16th (the twenty sixth anniversary of the Batman Forever's release). 

There’s a big push to get the hashtag #ReleaseTheSchumacherCut trending on twitter to see if Warner Brothers will consider releasing an extended cut of Batman Forever. Following on from last week's video about the contents of the "Schumacher Cut" here's a few corrections and clarifications.  

If you want to see the stuff I talk about in these videos, go to twitter and let @ATT @hbomax @jasonkilar know that you want them to #ReleaseTheSchumacherCut

Friday, June 11, 2021

Riddle Me This - What is the Schumacher Cut (and what does it contain)?

 Okay here's something I've been working on for a while. Back in March 2021 a twitter user @MinddKidzag released three awesome scanned pieces of paper work from Batman Forever. 

1) First up, a copy of the shooting script (previously there was only the Batchler's original Batman 3 script and one of Akiva Goldsman's drafts). This scan appears to be what they actually shot and contains scenes and lines not featured in the film. Some of this tallies with the deleted scenes on the DVD and Blu-rays but some does not.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/14J_KaRP1zR3SOoG2us24dsE5z6LkBfor/view

2) A comprehensive film schedule detailing the order that everything was filmed. Again there are a couple of bits not featured in any script (featuring Nygma purchasing and developing Claw Island).

https://drive.google.com/file/d/14-gi2Uf1ZOetsRuoTI-K9Do3q8O4WQLD/view

3) A list of scenes to complete (ie. small insert shots needed after principal photography was completed). Some of these were done and some seemingly were abandoned (like the helicopter ride to Wayne Enterprises).

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1omDrt9X2JP1QPc2NQBtNvXdaI7lbLcxg/view

There’s a big push to get the hashtag #ReleaseTheSchumacherCut trending on twitter on 16th June (the twenty sixth anniversary of the film's release). As such I thought it would be a good idea to go through the script and pull out the missing stuff because I believe it ultimately tells us what the Schumacher Cut includes.

So if you want to see the stuff I talk about in the video, go online on 16th June and let @ATT @hbomax @jasonkilar know that you want them to #ReleaseTheSchumacherCut

And please follow @CutSchumacher on Twitter.


Thursday, March 25, 2021

Miscellaneous content: Scanned Batman Forever script by Akiva Goldsman

A user on twitter Mindd Kidzag has scanned a copy of the Batman Forever script. Unlike the two scripts that have been available previously which dated from late 1993 and early 1994 this is new one is specifically dated 13th October 1994. 

Interestingly the part where Dick steals the Batmobile and confronts the Neon Gang has handwritten dates at the top 13th February 1995(!) - suggesting this scene was rewritten towards the end of shooting.

This is really exciting because it tallies with the shooting period of 24th September 1994 to 2nd March 1995 and gives us the closest view as to what exactly was filmed. With the Snyder Cut of Justice League having just been released a lot of Batman fans are turning their attention to the Schumacher Cut of Batman Forever. In my view, this script is the best record of what that Schumacher Cut is/would be.

I'm going to be doing an in-depth video analysis of it soon but in the meantime, have a read by clicking here.

Monday, March 22, 2021